Applicants will have to choose whether they will be reviewed as part of an Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences (AHSS) or Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) panel.
The review process will involve two stages:
- Stage 1: Expression of Interest (EoI)
- Stage 2: Full Proposal
The programme design is driven by feedback from the research community and will account for a high volume of applications across a broad range of research areas.
Stage 1 is comprised of a short (4 page) EoI application that consists of Research Idea and Research Plan components. The Stage 1 review process will assess two criteria:
- Research Idea: Reviewers will assess clarity, importance/significance, and originality/novelty of the question(s). If gaps in knowledge are being addressed and if the research area is well understood.
- Research Plan: Reviewers will assess the clarity, importance, originality/novelty of the research aims; clarity, novelty and effectiveness of the research design; quality, novelty and appropriateness of methods/approach. Reviewers will also consider whether aims are feasible based on the proposed objectives and approach.
The top ranked proposals from Stage 1 will be invited to Stage 2 to submit a full proposal.
Stage 2 will comprise a full application; encompassing sections for applicant, research programme, and potential impact assessment. The Stage 2 review process will assess three criteria:
- Applicant key achievements and research track record: Reviewers will assess the quality, significance and relevance of the applicant’s key achievements and research track record, as demonstrated in their narrative CV, commensurate with their career stage and research discipline, and taking any periods of leave into account.
- Research Programme: Reviewers will assess the quality, significance and novelty of the research programme. Reviewers will consider points such as: novelty, importance, timeliness of the intended research; communication and description of the research; comprehension of the current state of the art; clearly delineated roles of the team, collaborators and students; suitability and achievability of the programme based on the experience of the applicant(s) and team; appropriate use of the requested budget, the sex and gender dimension; data management etc.
- Potential Impact: Reviewers will review an Impact Statement and from this assess the applicant’s ability to demonstrate the potential impact and value to Ireland. Reviewers will consider points such as: Appreciation of how research may be developed and exploited; realistic and convincing evaluation of the benefits that will result from a successful project; potential to leverage success in European and International funding programmes; areas and fields where impacts are likely to be made.
An outline of the full review process can be found in the call document.
Handbooks for each stage will be provided and should be used in conjunction with the call document.